The complaint is ongoing. We will post updates as and when they occur.
We will be sending the article to Kawasaki UK and asking for a response.
_____________________________________________________________________
No Mr Kawasaki it is not acceptable
At the end of May 2011 I purchased a brand new
black Kawasaki GTR1400, the first time I’ve bought a brand new motorcycle in 20
years and the most money, by some distance, I have ever spent on a motorcycle.
Why did I choose new and why did I choose the
GTR1400?
I ride all year, both for pleasure and simply as day to day transport,
I also carry pillions fairly often, so the GTR fitted the bill perfectly. I
looked at the BMW K1300GT but the deal on the GTR was so much better it
convinced me to go with the Kawasaki. I chose new as because I cover a lot of
miles compared to most motorcyclists, usually around 15,000 a year, a
comprehensive warranty seemed like a good idea. How right I was, but not for
the reasons I had envisaged.
During my 15 months ownership my GTR has spent 7
weeks, so far, at the dealer not including servicing, this equates to a week
roughly every two months. The list of faults started after a few months with
the battery, just as I was heading off for the ferry, not ideal but also not
unusual. The dealer was very helpful and had a replacement prepared and ready
to go. However I still had to get to them to return the faulty one and swop it
over, delaying my trip for an entire day. Next was the failure of the KIPASS
(Kawasaki Intelligent Proximity Activation Start System) which decided to shut
the bike down, whilst I was travelling at 25mph, had it done so at motorway
speeds I dread to think of the consequences. This fault, I must stress, appears
to be an isolated case and took a fortnight to diagnose and repair correctly.
Finally the KIPASS ECU had to be replaced, something which the dealer had
recommended on day one but Kawasaki Motors UK (KMUK) wanted to explore other
possibilities. Once the ECU had been replaced, and a new transponder coded to
it, the bike was back to working order. Next I noticed that the paint on the
tank, under the seat, had worn through and was beginning to rust, not ideal on
a bike that had only covered just over 6,000 miles at this point. The dealer
took photos and submitted a warranty claim, KMUK agreed to repair the paint and
fit a protective layer over it to prevent it reoccurring.
The next problem appeared at the same time and
4,000 miles later still has not been totally rectified. The clutch lever
started coming back to the handlebar alarmingly quickly, so back to the dealer I
went, after another round of debate between dealer and KMUK the master cylinder
was replaced. The bike now went as it should, but whilst cleaning it I realised
that the shock absorber adjuster was seized, so contacted the dealer again and
asked them to order a replacement so that it could be fitted at the same time
as the paint was repaired. The panel that houses the heated grip control had
also cracked so would be replaced at the same time. On presenting the bike to
the dealer for repair I found that the only part in stock was the heated grip
panel, and that my clutch was failing again, this time a new slave cylinder was required.
More debate between dealer and KMUK and it
transpired that the shock was on back order, but after speaking to KMUK they
would send a demo unit to be fitted until the new one arrived. Two weeks later
the shock arrived, just as my clutch started to fail again!
So Kawasaki’s ‘Flagship Tourer’ is great as
long as you can get to a dealer every two months to have it fixed. The amount
of time and money wasted has been considerable, around £500 in finance payments
alone for a bike I haven’t been able to ride, plus the cost of my time and
travel. I have been in contact with KMUK customer service and their response
has been polite, but action is what is required. In response to my last
complaint they retorted;
If it is of any reassurance,
the majority of issues you have experienced are not indicative of this model
and is not a true representation of the 1400GTR in general.
Now this may be the case, however this does not
address the issues with my bike.
However, I can confirm that we
have seen a few cases of the preload adjuster seizing on the rear shock
absorber. This is purely caused by lack of use and to prevent any reoccurrence
in the future, we would recommend periodic use of the adjuster to keep the
mechanism in the adjuster working freely.
So I should alter the suspension setting every
time I use the bike? Never had to with any other bike.
Unfortunately, with any mass
produced item using many different components and using many different
suppliers providing these parts. Occasionally components can fail, which is why
Kawasaki provide a Two Year Warranty with all our Motorcycles to cover these
eventualities and to rectify them as quickly as possible through our Dealer
Network.
An excuse used by almost every manufacturer but
not an acceptable one when you have repeated failures. But please do not worry
because you can buy more.
For further peace of mind we
do offer an extended warranty, which can increase the 2 Year Manufacturers
warranty to a 4 Year Manufacturers warranty. The current price of 'Warranty
Plus' is £350 inc Vat, which maybe something worth considering depending on how
long you intend to keep the motorcycle for added peace of mind.
I am frankly depressed and disgusted by my
experience, I was a huge fan of Kawasaki having previously owned a ZZR600, 1100
and 1200 and a ZX6R as well, but I’m not anymore. I am not unreasonable in my
expectations, I know I have to treat my bikes with ACF50 and regularly clean
them, that nuts and bolts will fur and need replacing and that every motorcycle
will have a few issues.
So is my GTR fit for purpose as a ‘Flagship
Tourer’? I would say no. I rely on my
bike as I don’t own a car, and to have to lose it for a week every two months
is NOT acceptable Mr Kawasaki!